Medical review has not been completed.
No medical reviewer or medical-review completion date is claimed. A source check does not equal a clinician's approval.
What should be reviewed?
For each medical page, a designated clinician should check the terminology, anatomy, suitability statements, alternatives, risks, recovery wording and limits. Review should cover the visible English text, tables, captions, FAQs and structured data.
What needs special attention here?
- The difference between a forehead/brow lift and a sub-brow excision.
- The overlap between lower blepharoplasty and fat repositioning.
- Descriptions of revision timing without a universal waiting period.
- AI eye measurements versus manual crease demonstration.
- Avoiding unsupported skin-thickness measurement or VECTRA double-eyelid simulation claims.
What should a future review record contain?
A review record should identify the reviewer with consent to attribution, approved version, scope, date and conditions. A substantive later change should return to review rather than silently retaining an earlier status.
What would review not mean?
Approval of general information would not create a doctor-patient relationship, certify a clinic, guarantee a result or make a page suitable for individual medical decisions. The treating clinician remains the source for personal advice.